Cases 11 - 20 of 297
AIG Property Casualty Company v. Scott et al
as 3:2023cv00421
Plaintiff:
AIG Property Casualty Company
Defendant:
Clark Scott, Kelly Scott and Wyatt Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Taylor v. Todd et al
as 4:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
David Jason Taylor
Defendant:
Bruce Todd, Colonel Leslie Gibson, Felicia Rowan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neikirk v. Ephraim McDowell Health, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
Kelly Neikirk
Defendant:
Ephraim McDowell Health, Inc.
Kelly et al v. Steinman et al
as 5:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Adam Kelly
Intervenor Plaintiff:
AIU Insurance Company
Defendant:
David Steinman and Timmons Logistics Group, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ricci v. Scott et al
as 3:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
Faye Ricci
Defendant:
Wyatt Scott, Clark Scott, Kelly Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Kelly v. Hughes et al
as 6:2022cv00208
Defendant:
Tammy Croley, Pamela Collett Hughes, Francis Witt-Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Morgan Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bybee v. Aramark Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00571
Plaintiff:
Kelly Bybee
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc. and New York Life
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 eb Removal - E.R.I.S.A. Employee Benefits
Napper et al v. Goodlett et al
as 3:2022cv00533
Plaintiff:
Chelsey Napper and Cody Etherton
Defendant:
Kelly Hanna Goodlett and Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
