Cases 11 - 20 of 893
Stanley H Solvey v. Ken Clark
as 2:2023cv00745
Petitioner:
Stanley H. Solvey
Respondent:
Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Solvey v. Clark
as 1:2023cv00137
Petitioner:
Stanley H. Solvey
Respondent:
Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Solvey v. Clark
as 1:2022cv01634
Petitioner:
Stanley H. Solvey
Respondent:
Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Devonte Harris v. K Kyle, et al
as 22-16895
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEVONTE BERNARD HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
K KYLE, RALPH DIAZ, KEN CLARKE and others
(PC) Martinez v. Campbell et al
as 1:2022cv01549
Plaintiff:
Ronald F. Martinez
Defendant:
Tammy Campbell, Ken Clark, E. McDaniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Campbell et al
as 3:2022cv07502
Plaintiff:
Ronald F. Martinez
Defendant:
Tammy Campbell, Ken Clark, E. McDaniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Martinez v. D. Baughman, et al
as 22-16750
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD F. MARTINEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
D. BAUGHMAN, Associate Director CDCR at CDCR Headquarters in Sacramento, S. ALFARO, Associate Director CDCR (A) at CDCR Headquarters in Sacramento, G. JAIME, Associate Director CDCR (A) at CDCR Headquarters in Sacramento and others
(PC) Figueroa v. Clark, et al.
as 1:2022cv01200
Plaintiff:
Ruben Figueroa
Defendant:
Ken Clark, Paul Silva, John and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Young v. Clark et al
as 1:2022cv01219
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Powell Young
Defendant:
Ken Clark, M. Gamboa, Galleger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Young v. Clark et al
as 2:2022cv01646
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Powell Young
Defendant:
Ken Clark, M. Gamboa, Galleger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
