Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Kendrick v. O'Boyle
as 1:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Fredric Kendrick
Defendant:
Taylor O'Boyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Rhyne v. Kendrick et al
as 2:2023cv00657
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Rhyne
Defendant:
Deputy Kendrick and Josh Wyche
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC et al v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2023cv01177
Plaintiff:
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC, Rose Lane and Franny's Operations, Inc.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Glenn Youngkin, Jason S. Miyares and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0554 Constitutionality of State Statutes
Kendrick v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 7:2022cv00454
Petitioner:
Richard Wade Kendrick
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia and Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kendrick v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 7:2022cv00431
Petitioner:
Richard Wade Kendrick
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia and Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Leu
as 1:2022cv00300
Petitioner:
Kendrick White and Kedrick White
Respondent:
Warden Leu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kendrick v. Edmonds
as 7:2021cv00505
Petitioner:
Richard Wade Kendrick
Respondent:
L. Edmonds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Watkins v. Leabought et al
as 3:2021cv00338
Defendant:
Kendrick, Hood, Larry Leabought and others
Plaintiff:
Quitez Lamar Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kendrick v. Albemarle County et al
as 7:2021cv00141
Defendant:
Amanda Galloway, Jeff Richardson, Robert Thaccee and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Wade Kendrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodley v. Leabough et al
as 3:2020cv00993
Defendant:
Officer Marshall, Lt. Smith, Sgt. Michael Plutro and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Alroy Woodley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
