Cases 1 - 10 of 474
Deas v. Atkinson et al
as 5:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Deandrae Deas
Defendant:
Kenneth Atkinson, Trevor Smith, Scott Colvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hall v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Michael Hall
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Deas v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County et al
as 5:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Deandrae Deas
Defendant:
Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kenneth Atkerson, Jeramie Waak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keeton v. SSA
as 5:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Keeton
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Gottsman v. SSA
as 7:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Robert Gottsman
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Daniels v. Warden FCI Ashland
as 0:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
Kenneth Daniels
Respondent:
Warden FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Watson v. Woodford County Detention Center
as 5:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Reginald Kenneth Watson, Jr.
Defendant:
Woodford County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Woodford County Detention Center
as 3:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Reginald Kenneth Watson, Jr.
Defendant:
Woodford County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Elizabethtown Police Department
as 3:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Reginald Kenneth Watson, Jr.
Defendant:
Elizabethtown Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Hughes
as 3:2024cv00062
Petitioner:
Kenneth W. Brown
Respondent:
Craig Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
