Cases 11 - 20 of 236
MARTINEZ v. CAMERON et al
as 5:2016cv00762
Petitioner:
LUIS MARTINEZ
Respondent:
KENNETH CAMERON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PAOLINO v. CAMERON et al
as 2:2015cv06748
Petitioner:
RICHARD GERALD PAOLINO
Respondent:
KENNETH CAMERON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, HONORABLE KATHLEEN KANE, ESQ.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KNAUSS v. CAMERON et al
as 2:2015cv06507
Petitioner:
JOSEPH R. KNAUSS
Respondent:
KENNETH CAMERON, FREDRICK J. AMMERMAN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MAYO v. CAMERON et al
as 3:2015cv00270
Plaintiff:
SHANNON MAYO
Defendant:
KENNETH CAMERON, DORETTA CHENCHARICK, PEGGY BAUGHMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitby v. Cameron et al
as 3:2015cv01967
Petitioner:
Ervin Warfield Whitby
Respondent:
Kenneth Cameron, PA Attorney General and York County District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JONES v. CAMERON et al
as 2:2015cv05377
Petitioner:
NATHANIEL JONES
Respondent:
KENNETH CAMERON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CADMUS v. SUPERINTENDENT KENNETH CAMERON et al
as 3:2015cv00244
Plaintiff:
NORMAN CADMUS
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT KENNETH CAMERON, DEPUTY DAVID J. CLOSE, DEPUTY KENNETH HOLLENBAUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. CAMERON et al
as 3:2015cv00217
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JONES
Defendant:
KENNETH CAMERON, NAJI, DEBRA YOUNKIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter v. Cameron et al
as 3:2015cv01625
Petitioner:
Tyrone Porter
Respondent:
Kenneth Cameron and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RICHBURG v. CAMERON
as 2:2015cv04748
Petitioner:
EMERSON RICHBURG
Respondent:
KENNETH CAMERON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
