Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Lee v. Williams et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2010cv00754
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kenneth Lee
Defendant:
Sgt. Williams, Sgt. Thompkins, Louis Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Boyd (INMATE2)
as 2:2010cv00716
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kenneth Lee
Defendant:
Louis Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Board et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2010cv00634
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kenneth Lee
Defendant:
Luew Board, Sergeant Jackson, Sergeant Spech and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Hendrick et al
as 1:2010cv00368
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kenneth Lee
Defendant:
Capt. Hendrick, Carter Davenport, Warden Miles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Summerfield et al v. R & L Transfer, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00150
Plaintiff:
John Summerfield and Alessio Summerfield
Defendant:
R & L Transfer, Inc., R & L Transfer, Inc., R & L Transfer, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Lee v. G.K. Fountain Disciplinary Court et al(INMATE 2)
as 2:2009cv00707
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kenneth Lee
Defendant:
G.K. Fountain Disciplinary Court and Preston Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Askew v. R & L Transfer, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00865
Plaintiff:
Lucile Askew and Lucile Askew
Defendant:
R & L Transfer, Inc. and Kenneth Lee Holt
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Lee v. Marcus et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2008cv00568
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kenneth Lee
Defendant:
Brenda Marcus, Lewis Boyd, Warden Hope and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lee v. Hope et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2007cv00996
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kenneth Lee
Defendant:
Warden Hope, Louis Boyd, Lt. Speck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Hope et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2007cv00795
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kenneth Lee
Defendant:
Warden Hope, Louis Boyd, Lt. Speck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
