Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02731
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Smith v. Wigman et al
as 3:2023cv50105
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Smith
Defendant:
Gary Wigman, Michael Kostecki, William Brogan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith et al v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2022pq01113
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Smith and Linda Smith
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2021pq01347
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Smith
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Pfister et al
as 1:2020cv06756
Defendant:
Wexford Health Source, Inc, Bautista, Randy Pfister and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Melrose Park et al
as 1:2019cv07851
Defendant:
William Bianchi, Chane Fogg, Village of Melrose Park and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Nicholson et al
as 1:2018cv06916
Defendant:
J-Jane Doe, F-Ezel Michael, Moreno Ana and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Keystone RV Company et al
as 2:2017cv02126
Defendant:
Keystone RV Company and Four Winds of America Inc
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Smith and Lisa E Smith
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Smith v. Butler et al
as 3:2015cv01277
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Smith
Defendant:
Kimberly Butler , Woods , Sherry Benton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. AbbVie Inc., et al
as 1:2015cv07584
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Smith
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Unimed Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Solvay, S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
