Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Adams et al v. Sillen
as 4:2020cv08289
Plaintiff:
Harvey Rayburn, Darren Williams, Juan Meza and others
Defendant:
Robert Sillen
Abdulle et al v. Sillen et al
as 4:2020cv07065
Plaintiff:
Danny Dallas, Darren Williams, Bruce Koklich and others
Defendant:
Robert Sillen and John Clark Kelso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdulle et al v. Sillen et al
as 4:2020cv00731
Plaintiff:
Danny Dallas, Darren Williams, Bruce Koklich and others
Defendant:
Robert Sillen and J. Clark Kelso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdulle et al v. Sillen et al
as 4:2020cv00728
Plaintiff:
Danny Dallas, Darren Williams, Bruce Koklich and others
Defendant:
Robert Sillen and John Clark Kelso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Washington v. United States of America
as 2:2018cv01029
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Kenneth Washington
Washington v. Meier et al
as 2:2015cv00499
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Washington
Defendant:
R Meier, H. Gibson, Searby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abukar et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al
as 1:2014cv00816
Plaintiff:
Abdulle Abukar , Ruben Arechiga , John Wesley Bess and others
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund G. Brown, Jeffrey A. Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abukar et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al
as 2:2014cv01137
Plaintiff:
Abdulle Abukar , Ruben Arechiga , John Wesley Bess and others
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund G. Brown, Jeffrey A. Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abukar et al v. McQuarn et al
as 2:2014at00586
Plaintiff:
Abdulle Abukar , Ruben Arechiga , John Wesley Bess and others
Defendant:
Charles McQuarn, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund G. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Nangalama et al
as 2:2014cv00232
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Washington
Defendant:
Andrew Nangalama and J Wedell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
