Cases 11 - 20 of 52
City of Dover et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019cv01749
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Seaford, City of Dover and Kent County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01243
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Darrell Law v. Thomas MaCauley, et al
as 19-2473
Defendant / Appellee:
SHAWN DOHERTY, JUSTICE STRINE, DE Supreme Court, JUSTICE SEITZ, DE Supreme Court and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRELL LAW
Davis v. Superior Court Kent County
as 1:2018cv02049
Plaintiff:
Peter Davis, III
Defendant:
Superior Court Kent County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Matthew Jones v. Harrington Police Department, et al
as 17-2317
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
HARRINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT and JUSTICE OF THE PEACE NUMBER 6, in Kent County, Delaware
Matthew Jones v. Kent County Superior Court
as 17-2316
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
KENT COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, Delaware
Jones v. Harrington Delaware Police Department, et al
as 1:2017cv00395
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Harrington Delaware Police Department and Justice of the Peace Court Number 6, in Kent County, Delaware
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Kent County Superior Court, Delaware
as 1:2017cv00394
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Kent County Superior Court, Delaware
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. KENT COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, DELAWARE
as 2:2017cv00965
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
KENT COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, DELAWARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. HARRINGTON DELAWARE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2017cv00966
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
HARRINGTON DELAWARE POLICE DEPARTMENT and JUSTICE OF THE PEACE COURT NUMBER 6, IN KENT COUNTY, DELAWARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
