Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Ray v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Parole Board et al
as 3:2023cv00658
Plaintiff:
Wayne Anthony Ray
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky Parole Board, LB, MJ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Utley v. Kentucky Parole Board et al
as 3:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Terry Wayne Utley
Defendant:
Kentucky Parole Board and Ky, Dept of Corr. Probation, Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Branham et al
as 7:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Heath Anthony Baker, Ashley, Anthony Heath Baker and others
Defendant:
Christy Branham, Kentucky Parole Board, Cookie Crews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glenn Odom, II, et al v. Skyla Grief, et al
as 21-6249
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLENN D. ODOM, II and CHRISTOPHER A. NUCKOLS
Defendant / Appellee:
SKYLA GRIEF, KENTUCKY PAROLE BOARD, SCOTT JORDAN, Warden and others
Odom et al v. Grief et al
as 5:2021cv00109
Plaintiff:
Glenn D. Odom and Christopher A. Nuckols
Defendant:
Skyla Grief, Kentucky Parole Board, Scott Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elbert LongIn re: Elbert Long
as 20-6191
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, ANNA VALENTINE, Warden and LELIA A. VANHOOSE, Chair, Commonwealth of Kentucky Parole Board
Petitioner:
In re: ELBERT PHILLIP LONG
Mayes v. Kentucky Parole Board
as 3:2018cv00032
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Mayes
Defendant:
Kentucky Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayes v. Kentucky Parole Board
as 3:2018cv00369
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Mayes
Defendant:
Kentucky Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Kentucky Parole Board et al
as 5:2017cv00072
Petitioner:
Carlton Freeman
Respondent:
Kentucky Parole Board and Lee A. VanHoose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Doneghy v. Kentucky Parole Board et al
as 3:2017cv00022
Plaintiff:
Glenn Rahan Doneghy
Defendant:
Kentucky Parole Board and Van Hussin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
