Cases 1 - 10 of 549
Mayo v. Spotten et al
as 3:2024cv00884
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Mayo
Defendant:
Kerri Spotten, Jane Doe, Marissa Goldberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Turoczi et al v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Jason Turoczi, Chad Weed, Richard Brown and others
Defendant:
Scott Sempel, Edward Maldonado, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thibodeau v. Lippert Components, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
Kevin Thibodeau
Defendant:
Lippert Components, Inc., Mactaw CT, Inc. doing business as Pete's RV Center and Jayco, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Alvarado v. Maldenado et al
as 3:2024cv00761
Plaintiff:
Marcus Alvarado
Defendant:
Maldenado, Rich Hardy, Kevin Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Maldonado et al
as 3:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Larry H. Brown
Defendant:
Edward Maldonado, Kevin Roy and Scott Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Boyd
Defendant:
Semple, Arone, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gridley v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00689
Plaintiff:
Alec Gridley
Defendant:
Semple, Arnone, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blango v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
Matthew Blango
Defendant:
Semple, Arnone, Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonvie v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00616
Plaintiff:
Joshua Bonvie
Defendant:
Semple, Arnone, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
