Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Woods v. McKeithen et al
as 3:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Woods
Defendant:
Jack McKeithen, Kevin Wyles, David Callender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. McKeithen et al
as 3:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Woods
Defendant:
Jack McKeithen, Kevin Wyles, David Callender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walston v. Wyles et al
as 3:2023cv01595
Petitioner:
Jean Paul Walston
Respondent:
Kevin Wyles and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guardado v. Bennett et al
as 3:2023cv00389
Defendant:
Clay Bennett, Clay Bennet and Kevin Wyles
Plaintiff:
Carlos Armando Guardado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bolden v. Wyles et al
as 3:2022cv06070
Plaintiff:
Clarence Bolden
Defendant:
Kevin Wyles, David Callender, Clay Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broussard v. Caldwell Correctional Center et al
as 3:2022cv00533
Plaintiff:
Derrick J Broussard
Defendant:
Caldwell Correctional Center, Clay Bennett, Kevin Wyles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Wheats et al
as 5:2021cv03179
Plaintiff:
**Sanctioned/Barred* Dennis Ray Davis, Jr
Defendant:
Captain Wheats, Major Haden, C/O Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Caldwell Correctional Center et al
as 3:2021cv01404
Defendant:
John Doe, Caldwell Correctional Center, David Calendar and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scroggins v. Wyles et al
as 5:2021cv00534
Defendant:
Mekisha Smith Creal, LA Justices of Supreme Court, District Attorney Caddo and others
Plaintiff:
Marc Scroggins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Collier v. Wyles
as 3:2021cv00338
Defendant:
Kevin Wyles
Plaintiff:
George Anthony Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
