Cases 31 - 40 of 694
POWELL v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00950
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE POWELL
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
HARDEN v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00940
Plaintiff:
SUMMER HARDEN
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
THOMPSON v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00942
Plaintiff:
DARRYL THOMPSON
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Figueroa v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00598
Plaintiff:
Mary Figueroa
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
VINES v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00923
Plaintiff:
MELVIN VINES
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Magyar v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00182
Plaintiff:
John Magyar
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Smith v. Kijakazi
as 7:2023cv01461
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Smith
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Bales v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00682
Plaintiff:
John W Bales, Jr and John William Bales, Jr.
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Huffin v. Kijakazi
as 7:2023cv01459
Plaintiff:
Dianna P. Huffin
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
