Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Stovall v. Marc Jones Construction, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2022cv02137
Plaintiff:
Joseph E Stovall
Defendant:
Marc Jones Construction, L.L.C. and Michael Kilpatrick
Not Classified By Court:
Temiika Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Carter v. Chisholm, Chisholm & Kilpatrick et al (TV1)
as 2:2021cv00151
Plaintiff:
Darrell Frank Carter
Defendant:
Chisholm, Chisholm & Kilpatrick, USAA, Department of Veterans Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00625
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toney v. Hamilton County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2019cv00342
Plaintiff:
Charles Toney
Defendant:
John Does I-X, Blake Kilpatrick, Jim Hammond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Sexton v. Hamilton County Goverment et al (PLR2)
as 1:2018cv00017
Defendant:
Hamilton County Goverment , Spencer Daniels , Blake Kilpatrick and others
Plaintiff:
Ashley Nichole Sexton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nance, et al v. Kilpatrick, et al (TV1)
as 1:2018cv00011
Plaintiff:
Larry Darnell Nance, Jr and Sherry Nance
Defendant:
Trent Martin Kilpatrick and Hans Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Kilpatrick v. Vyaire Medical, Inc.
as 3:2017cv01543
Plaintiff:
David Kilpatrick
Defendant:
Vyaire Medical, Inc.
Counter_plaintiff:
Vyaire Medical, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
David Kilpatrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
