Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Tucker v. The Hartford
as 3:2022cv00513
Plaintiff:
Kim Tucker
Defendant:
The Hartford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 eb Removal - E.R.I.S.A. Employee Benefits
FTC v. Red Cedar Services, Inc., et al
as 22-16484
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant:
RED CEDAR SERVICES, INC., DBA 500FastCash, SFS, INC., DBA OneClickCash, AMG CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Not Classified By Court:
E.T.S. VENTURES, LLC, EL DORADO TRAILER SALES, LLC, DALE E. BECKER and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICANS FOR FINANCIAL REFORM, DEBORAH MOSS and FIRST PREMIER BANK
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID FEINGOLD, DYLAN, JAGGER INVESTMENT CO., HOMEOWNERS REALTY, LLC and others
Appellee:
KIM TUCKER
Receiver:
THOMAS W. MCNAMARA
Loretta Little, et al v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 17-80178
Plaintiff - Respondent:
LORETTA LITTLE, BRENDA ANDERSON, STELLA BATTEN and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
PFIZER, INC.
Little et al v. Pfizer Inc.
as 2:2014cv02263
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc and McKesson Corporation
Plaintiff:
Loretta Little , Brenda Anderson , Stella Batten and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Little, et al v. Pfizer, Inc.
as CAN/4:14-cv-01177
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc. and McKesson Corporation
Plaintiff:
Loretta Little , Brenda Anderson , Stella Batten and others
Little et al v. Pfizer Inc.
as 3:2014cv01177
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc. and McKesson Corporation
Plaintiff:
Loretta Little , Brenda Anderson , Stella Batten and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Little et al v. Pfizer Inc.
as 3:2014cv01177
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc and McKesson Corporation
Plaintiff:
Loretta Little , Brenda Anderson , Stella Batten and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lebedchik v. AT&T et al
as 2:2007cv00392
Plaintiff:
Yelena Lebedchik, Yelena Lebedchik, Yelena Lebedchik and others
Defendant:
AT&T, Pacific Bell Telephone Company and SBC Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
