Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Cleveland v. Wayne, County of et al
as 5:2026cv12162
Plaintiff:
Pierre Cleveland
Defendant:
Wayne, County of, Kim Worthy and John Doe
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Derrick Cardello-SmithIn re: Derrick Cardello-Smith
as 26-1498
Petitioner:
In re: DERRICK LEE CARDELLO-SMITH
Respondent:
LAURIE MIRLES-SMITH, Assistant Wayne County Prosecutor, KIM WORTHY, Chief Wayne County Prosecutor, DEYANA F. UNIS, Assistant Wayne County Prosecutor and others
Cross v. State of Michigan et al
as 2:2026cv10207
Plaintiff:
Jebrie Cross
Defendant:
State of Michigan, Wayne, County of, Detroit, City of and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Simmons v. Washington et al
as 2:2025cv13786
Petitioner:
Latausha Simmons
Respondent:
Raphael Washington, Kim Worthy, James White and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Davis v. Nessel et al
as 2:2025cv13078
Plaintiff:
Jaquan Davis
Defendant:
Kim Worthy, Dana Nessel and James F. Grady II
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Darryl McGore v. Dana Nessel, et al
as 25-1141
Plaintiff:
DARRYL MCGORE
Defendant:
DANA NESSEL, Attorney General, KIM WORTHY, Attorney Prosecutor, ALVIN C. SALLEN, Defense Attorney and others
Latausha Simmons v. Louis Swafford, et al
as 24-1962
Defendant:
ROSALYN DAWSON, Courtroom Clerk, LUTHER W. GLENN, JR., appointed side-counsel, MARLENA TAYLOR and others
Plaintiff:
LATAUSHA SIMMONS
Latausha Simmons v. Raphael Washington, et al
as 24-1757
Respondent:
JAMES WHITE, City of Detroit Police Chief, KIM WORTHY, Wayne County Prosecutor, RAPHAEL WASHINGTON, Wayne County Sheriff and others
Petitioner:
LATAUSHA SIMMONS
Simmons v. Washington et al
as 2:2024cv11454
Respondent:
Kim Worthy, James White, Regina D. Thomas and others
Petitioner:
Latausha Simmons
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Derrick Smith v. Google, LLC, et al
as 23-1198
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK LEE SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
GOOGLE, LLC, GOOGLE, INC., MICROSOFT CORPORATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
