Cases 1 - 9 of 9
STOJAK v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00685
Petitioner:
KIMBA STOJAK
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Frederick Banks v. Greta Thunberg, et al
as 19-3419
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant / Appellee:
KIMBA, KENDRICK LAMAR, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Kimba Ngana v. U.S. Attorney General
as 19-13849
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
KIMBA P. NGANA
In re: Ezaz Chowdhury
as 18-1144
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: EZAZ KABIR CHOWDHURY
Defendant - Respondent:
KIMBA M. WOOD, Individually and Personally quoad hoc Supplier to Account #-054 of Kidnapped N.Y. Citizens for Transport to N.J. for Debt Bondage doing business as Account #-054" Depositary/Trustee, STATE OF NEW YORK and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Not Party - Proposed Intervenor Petitioner:
JULIET MARJORIE CHOWDHURY
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
NOEL L. HILLMAN
In re: Ezaz Chowdhury
as 17-3343
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: EZAZ KABIR CHOWDHURY
Defendant - Respondent:
KIMBA M. WOOD, Individually and Personally quoad hoc Supplier to Account #-054 of Kidnapped N.Y. Citizens for Transport to N.J. for Debt Bondage doing business as Account #-054 Depositary/Trustee, STATE OF NEW YORK and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
NOEL L. HILLMAN
Valle v. United States of America
as 13-2593
Petitioner:
Israel Valle
Respondent:
United States of America, Barack H. Obama, George W. Bush and others
Midas International Corporation v. Kimba Corp.
as 2:2011mc00066
Defendant:
Kimba Corp.
Plaintiff:
Midas International Corporation
Valle v. United States of America et al
as 1:2008mc00604
Plaintiff:
Israel Valle
Defendant:
United States of America, George W. Bush, Dannis Jacobs and others
Valle v. United States of America et al
as 1:2008mc00567
Plaintiff:
Israel Valle
Defendant:
United States of America, George W. Bush, Dannis Jacobs and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
