Cases 1 - 10 of 20
King v. Pioneer Press News Paper et al
as 0:2024cv01477
Plaintiff:
Arron Scott King, Sr
Defendant:
Pioneer Press News Paper and News Reports - Reporters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daley Farm of Lewiston, L.L.P. et al v. Kovecsi et al
as 0:2022cv02957
Plaintiff:
Ben Daley, Daley Farm of Lewiston, L.L.P., Michael Daley and others
Defendant:
Marie H. Kovecsi, Chris M. Meyer, Greg D. Olson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Kaisamba-Kanneh v. Dakota County District Court et al
as 0:2022cv02661
Plaintiff:
Alpha L. Kaisamba-Kanneh
Defendant:
Dakota County District Court, Minnesota Guardian Ad Litem Board, Hon. Kathryn Davis Messerich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jerk King, Inc. v. City of Rochester et al
as 0:2021cv02545
Plaintiff:
Jerk King, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Rochester and Destination Medical Center Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Rice County et al
as 0:2020cv01985
Defendant:
Sartor, J. Does 1-5, Malecha and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Allen King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv02108
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
King v. Reiser
as 0:2017cv00838
Plaintiff:
Gregory Isaac King
Defendant:
Bruce Reiser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King et al v. County of St. Louis et al
as 0:2017cv00758
Plaintiff:
Paul King and Copasetic, Inc.
Defendant:
County of St. Louis and Duluth Economic Development Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2015cv00616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
