Cases 21 - 28 of 28
KING PHARMACEUTICALS INC. et al v. SANDOZ INC.
as 3:2008cv02802
Plaintiff:
KING PHARMACEUTICALS INC., KING PHARMACEUTICALS INC., KING PHARMACEUTICALS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, INC. and others
Defendant:
SANDOZ INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. CEPHALON, INC.
as 2:2008cv02141
Intervenor:
PADDOCK LABORATORIES, INC., ASTRAZENECA PLC, URL PHARMA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant:
CEPHALON, INC.
Respondent:
MATTHEW PIKE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Conway v. King Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 3:2008cv00303
Plaintiff:
Willie J. Conway
Defendant:
King Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
PIERI v. KING PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
as 3:2008cv00433
Plaintiff:
STEVEN PIERI
Defendant:
KING PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
KING PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ET AL V. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.
as 2:2007cv05618
Plaintiff:
KING PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., KING PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS DEUTSCHLAND GMBH and others
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
KING PHARMACEUTICALS INC. et al v. ACTAVIS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv05041
Plaintiff:
KING PHARMACEUTICALS INC., KING PHARMACEUTICALS INC., KING PHARMACEUTICALS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, INC. and others
Defendant:
ACTAVIS, INC. and ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
BAKER v. KING PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
as 3:2007cv00096
Plaintiff:
SCOTT A. BAKER
Defendant:
KING PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and KING PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act 1993 (FMLA)
KING PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. MARINE POLYMER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 3:2007cv01929
Petitioner:
KING PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and VASCULAR SOLUTIONS, INC.
Respondent:
MARINE POLYMER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
