Cases 1 - 10 of 183
King v. United States et al
as 5:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Clayton Orville King
Defendant:
United States, Communications Federal Credit Union and Resolute Systems LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hebert et al v. CFB Enterprises Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Soyoko Henert, Anthony Hebert, Alice King and others
Defendant:
CFB Enterprises Inc and GCL Enterprises LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Paramount Well Services LLC v. Gordon Bros Supply Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Paramount Well Services LLC
Defendant:
Gordon Bros Supply Inc and Service King Manufacturing Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
King et al v. Integris Health Inc
as 5:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Samantha King
Defendant:
Integris Health Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
King v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2023cv01141
Plaintiff:
Carey M King, Tearra King, Deoyon Janae Moore and others
Defendant:
Charles King, Cannady Paries, Deoyonte Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv01118
Plaintiff:
Clayton Orville King
Defendant:
United States of America and State Auditors for Taxes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
King v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 6:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
Robert King
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gordon v. Singh et al
as 5:2023cv00862
Plaintiff:
Shelbydale Gordon
Defendant:
Malkit Singh and Kings Truckline Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King v. Bailey
as 6:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
Landon Taylor and Dontaye King
Defendant:
James Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
