Cases 1 - 10 of 89
ZHANG v. DORRANCE PUBLISHING CO. et al
as 2:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
JEFF BAOLIANG ZHANG
Defendant:
DORRANCE PUBLISHING CO., MICHAEL KNAPP and VICKIE KOWALECKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
KAUFFMAN v. SMITH et al
as 3:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
DAVID R. KAUFFMAN
Defendant:
BARRY SMITH, ERIC YOUNG, BORDAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawley v. Salamon et al
as 3:2023cv01434
Plaintiff:
Antonio James Hawley
Defendant:
Warden Bobbi Jo Salamon, New RHU Unit Manager Cris Miller, Lt. Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coit v. Malichaik et al
as 1:2023cv01124
Plaintiff:
Kevin Coit
Defendant:
L. Malichaik, Bobbi Jo Salomon, M. Rowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKee v. Knapp et al
as 4:2023cv00963
Plaintiff:
Jamey McKee
Defendant:
M. Knapp and D.A. Minnoia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeGeorge v. Knapp et al
as 1:2023cv00568
Plaintiff:
Shannon DeGeorge
Defendant:
Michael Knapp, Seymour, A. Maines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Knapp v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00511
Plaintiff:
Kevin Knapp
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
McKee v. Durst et al
as 4:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
Jamey McKee
Defendant:
D. Durst and M. Knapp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moton v. Garman et al
as 1:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Myron Moton
Defendant:
Mr. Garman, Deputy Houser, Mr. Vangorder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cribbs v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv01950
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Elizabeth Cribbs
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, John E. Wetzel, George Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
