Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Dent v. Knotts et al
as 3:2021cv00797
Plaintiff: DeAngelo Demon Dent
Defendant: Sanford Earl Knotts, Hinds County Sheriff's Department and Mississippi Bar Association
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz v. Griffis et al
as 7:2020cv00191
Defendant: Captain Steven McNeill, Chief Deputy FNU Mancha, Sheriff Mike Griffis and others
Plaintiff: Ernesto Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beavers v. Griffis et al
as 7:2020cv00190
Defendant: Cpl. FNU Gonzalez, Chief Deputy FNU Mancha, Sheriff Mike Griffis and others
Plaintiff: Rusty Melvin Beavers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Griffis et al
as 7:2020cv00189
Defendant: Chief Deputy FNU Mancha, Sheriff Mike Griffis, Lt. Jesse Abalos and others
Plaintiff: Lyndon Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberson v. Morgan et al
as 4:2020cv02028
Defendant: Thomas H Butler, Debra R Booker, Angela Cooling and others
Plaintiff: Michael Cardora Roberson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberson v. Morgan et al
as 4:2020cv01583
Defendant: Thomas H Butler, Debra R Booker, Angela Cooling and others
Plaintiff: Michael Cardora Roberson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberson v. Morgan et al
as 4:2020cv01325
Defendant: Thomas H Butler, Debra R Booker, Angela Cooling and others
Plaintiff: Michael Cardora Roberson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Griffis et al
as 7:2019cv00011
Defendant: Eddie Mancha, FNU Ramos, FNU Knott and others
Plaintiff: Lyndon Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knott v. Cunningham et al
as 7:2018cv00165
Defendant: Unknown Doctor, Officer Clinton, Capt. Berryman and others
Plaintiff: Morris Dean Knott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knott v. Cunningham et al
as 4:2018cv02930
Plaintiff: Morris Dean Knott
Defendant: Capt. Berryman and Paul Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?