Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Alcalacarrillo et al v. Peters et al
as 3:2022cv00487
Plaintiff:
Oscar Fermin Alcalacarrillo, Adam Steven Anderson, Donald Lee Anderson and others
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Sue Washburn, Paula Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Kurisu et al v. Svenhard's Swedish Bakery Supplemental Key Management Retirement Plan et al
as 3:2021cv00912
Plaintiff:
Kerry Kurisu, Douglas Prola and Bill Pruitt
Defendant:
Ronny Svenhard, Svenhard's Swedish Bakery Supplemental Key Management Retirement Plan, James Kohles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Kohl v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2021cv00518
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Norman L. Kohl, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv01399
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Chira v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
as 3:2018cv02238
Defendant:
Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
ANGELO CHIRA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv00876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Little Whirlwind et al v. Washington County Court et al
as 3:2017cv01727
Defendant:
Thomas Kohl and Washington County Court
Plaintiff:
Cheyenne Little Whirlwind, Leegabe Little Whirlwind and Sage Little Whirlwind
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01385
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe and Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Simon Williams
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
