Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Kohler #301619 v. Mesa City Attorney's Office et al
as 2:2022cv01969
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Dean Kohler, Jr.
Defendant:
Mesa City Attorney's Office and Charles Kent Carroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kohler #301619 v. Mesa City Attorney's Office et al
as 2:2022cv01755
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Dean Kohler, Jr.
Defendant:
Mesa City Attorney's Office and Charles Kent Carroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kohler v. Mesa City Attorney's Office et al
as 2:2021cv01565
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Dean Kohler, Jr.
Defendant:
Mesa City Attorney's Office, Charles Kent Carroll, Rachel Phipps-Yonas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Kohler et al
as 2:2020cv00690
Defendant:
David Kohler and Samantha Marquez
Plaintiff:
Tony Junior Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doherty v. Ryan et al
as 2:2020cv00209
Defendant:
Lance Hetmer, Unknown Flores, Unknown Chacon and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin Thomas Doherty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schadewald-Kohler v. Cincinnati Casualty Company
as 2:2019cv01477
Defendant:
Cincinnati Casualty Company and Unknown Parties
Plaintiff:
Deborah Schadewald-Kohler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kohler #301619 v. Mesa City Attorney's Office et al
as 2:2018cv04101
Defendant:
Charles Kent Carroll and Mesa City Attorney's Office
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Dean Kohler, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marsh v. Zarcal Res Tempe LLC et al
as 2:2017cv04057
Plaintiff:
John Kohler Marsh
Defendant:
Zarcal Res Tempe LLC and Ucomm LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Kohler #301619 v. Mesa, City of et al
as 2:2017cv03010
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Dean Kohler, Jr.
Defendant:
Mesa, City of and Charles Kent Carroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marsh v. MINDGEEK S.A.R.L. et al
as 2:2017cv02724
Plaintiff:
John Kohler Marsh
Defendant:
MindGeek S.A.R.L. and Feras Antoon
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
