Cases 1 - 10 of 125
Dudzinski v. Kohl's, Inc.
as 24-288
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARY ANN DUDZINSKI
Defendant / Appellee:
KOHL'S, INC., DBA Kohl's Department Stores
Fashion Exchange, LLC v. Hybrid Promotions, LLC
as 23-7818
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FASHION EXCHANGE, LLC
Defendant:
JIMMY JAZZ, INC., FOOT LOCKER, INC., FOREVER 21 RETAIL, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
HYBRID PROMOTIONS, LLC, JARROD DOGAN, GAVIN DOGAN and others
Schafer v. Kohl's Department Store
as 5:2023cv02245
Plaintiff:
Tina Schafer
Defendant:
Kohl's Department Store
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Fashion Exchange, LLC v. Hybrid Promotions, LLC
as 23-7653
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FASHION EXCHANGE, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
HYBRID PROMOTIONS, LLC, JARROD DOGAN, GAVIN DOGAN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02677
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
David Webb v. USDC-WAWTA
as 22-70079
Not Classified By Court:
In re: DAVID Q. WEBB, STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HELATH SERVICES, KITSAP COUNTY GOVERNMENT and others
Petitioner:
DAVID Q. WEBB
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, TACOMA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
