Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Collins v. Stover
as 3:2024cv00282
Petitioner:
Kristina Collins
Respondent:
Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cordero v. Kijakazi
as 3:2021cv01588
Plaintiff:
Kristina Ann Cordero
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01888
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
S. Katzman Produce, Inc. et al v. Connecticut Fresh, Inc et al
as 3:2014cv01060
Plaintiff:
S. Katzman Produce, Inc. and Katzman Berry Corp.
Defendant:
Connecticut Fresh, Inc, Nicholas Bakes and Kristina M. Russbach
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Ruby Robinson Co., Inc. v. Connecticut Fresh, Inc et al
as 3:2013cv00472
Plaintiff:
Ruby Robinson Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Connecticut Fresh, Inc, Kristina M. Russbach, Nicholas Bakes and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Four Seasons Produce, Inc v. Connecticut Fresh, Inc et al
as 3:2012cv01478
Plaintiff:
Four Seasons Produce, Inc
Defendant:
Connecticut Fresh, Inc, Kristina M. Russback, Nicholas Bakes and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Lobston v. Dittman et al
as 3:2012cv01188
Plaintiff:
Percy Lobston
Defendant:
William Dittman, Richard Concurro, Mattew Galante and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
