Cases 1 - 10 of 115
Martin v. Kroger Limited Partnership I
as 6:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Pamela Martin
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership I and Corey Keith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Williams v. Kroger Limited Partnership I
as 2:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Anita Williams
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wilburn v. Kroger Limited Partnership I et al
as 7:2023cv00642
Plaintiff:
Loretta Wilburn
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership I and Southern Cleaning Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Reed v. Kroger Limited Partnership I
as 3:2023cv00313
Plaintiff:
Mary Louise Reed
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Scott v. Kroger Limited Partnership I
as 3:2023cv00321
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Scott
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Scott v. Kroger Limited Partnership I
as 1:2023cv00582
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Scott
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jones v. Kroger Limited Partnership I
as 2:2023cv00102
Plaintiff:
Sanford Jones
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership I doing business as Kroger #539
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rohm v. Kroger Limited Partnership I
as 3:2023cv00009
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership I and K
Plaintiff:
Mildred Rohm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
