Cases 1 - 10 of 572
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Jemison v. McMillen et al
as 1:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Dennis Elijah Jemison
Defendant:
Rodney McMillen, Kroger Company and Clay Richards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
The Kroger Co. v. Marten Transport Services, Ltd.
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
The Kroger Co.
Defendant:
Marten Transport Services, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Kroger Specialty Pharmacy FL 2, LLC et al v. Bessen
as 1:2023cv00816
Plaintiff:
Kroger Specialty Pharmacy FL 2, LLC and Kroger Prescription Plans, Inc.
Defendant:
Scarlette Bessen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Doe v. The Kroger Co.
as 1:2023cv00750
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Doe v. The Kroger Co.
as 1:2023cv00741
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Lee County, AL et al. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al.
as 1:2023op45010
Plaintiff:
Lee County, AL and Winston County, AL
Defendant:
Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., Hikma Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Alvogen Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
