Cases 1 - 8 of 8
SWINNEY et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2020cv02316
Defendant:
BANK MARKAZI JOMHOURI ISLAMI IRAN, NATIONAL IRANIAN OIL COMPANY, BANK MELLI IRAN and others
Plaintiff:
KWAN JOHNSON, ROBERT CHELONE, VLADIMIR QUERALES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv12303
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KWAN JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv05096
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KWAN JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
George Rishell v. Computer Sciences Corporation
as 16-2085
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GEORGE RISHELL, on his own behalf and on behalf of those similarly situated
Plaintiff:
VICTORIA RHODES, QUINTON GARDNER, SELINA RIGGS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION, a Foreign Profit Corporation
Victoria Rhodes v. Computer Sciences Corporation
as 14-2376
Plaintiff - Appellee:
VICTORIA RHODES, QUINTON GARDNER, SELINA RIGGS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
George Rishell v. Computer Sciences Corporation
as 14-2366
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GEORGE RISHELL, on his own behalf and on behalf of those similarly situated
Plaintiff:
VICTORIA RHODES, QUINTON GARDNER, SELINA RIGGS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION, a Foreign Profit Corporation
Rhodes et al v. Computer Sciences Corporation
as 1:2014cv00213
Plaintiff:
Victoria Rhodes , Quinton Gardner , Selina Riggs and others
Defendant:
Computer Sciences Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cintas Corporation v. Allen et al
as 3:2006cv05117
Petitioner:
Cintas Corporation
Respondent:
Joseph Allen, Joseph D. Biase, Kevin Borrmann and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
