Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Carter v. Rosch et al
as 7:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Charles Kenzell Carter
Defendant:
Kyle Rosch, Keith Almarode, Melissa Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simeon Briggs v. Kyle Rosch
as 24-6266
Plaintiff:
SIMEON BRIGGS
Defendant:
KYLE ROSCH, Interstate Coordinator
David Meyers v. Warden
as 23-7121
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN, of Red Onion State Prison, HAROLD W. CLARKE, VA DOC Director and KYLE ROSCH, VADOC Interstate Compact Administrator
David Meyers v. Dean Locklear
as 23-7057
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, ASSOCIATE WARDEN, TODD E. ISHEE, BRADESHAWN HARRIS, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6809
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Boykins v. Rosch
as 2:2023cv00363
Plaintiff:
Maurice Dontrell Boykins
Defendant:
Kyle Rosch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Church v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6678
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM LEBRON ANDREW CHURCH
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, TERRY GLENN, Virginia Department of Corrections Director, Coordinator, Interstate Compact Officer, KYLE ROSCH, Virginia Department of Corrections Director, Coordinator, Interstate Compact Officer and others
David Meyers v. Kyle Rosch
as 23-6586
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
KYLE ROSCH, VADOC Interstate Compact Administrator and HAROLD W. CLARKE, VADOC Director
Meyers v. Warden et al
as 7:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Warden, Harold Clarke and Kyle Rosch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6524
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director Virginia Department of Corrections and KYLE ROSCH, Interstate Compact Administrator
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
