Cases 1 - 10 of 6,941
Davis v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03188
Plaintiff:
Raymond L. Davis
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jamia v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC
as 1:2024cv00982
Plaintiff:
Cain Jamia and Jamia L. Thomas
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC doing business as Rushmore Servicing doing business as Rightpath Servicing and Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bunger v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03140
Plaintiff:
Tony L Bunger
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Logan v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03123
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Logan
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hatcher v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03127
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Ruby L. Hatcher
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dawkins v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv03126
Plaintiff:
Taiwan L. Dawkins
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Harris v. Kinner et al.
as 4:2024cv00950
Plaintiff:
Cornelius L. Harris
Defendant:
Joshua A. Kinner and Correctional Sgt. Sammons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03074
Plaintiff:
Brady L Murray
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Griffith v. Blankenship et al
as 1:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
Elisha L. Griffith
Defendant:
Chance Blankenship, Pam Wagner and City of Ironton, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
