Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Park v. Dart et al
as 1:2020cv06662
Defendant:
Charles L Austin, Parrish D Archer, County of Cook, Illinois and others
Plaintiff:
Jessica Park
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Austin, Jr. et al
as 1:2018cv05529
Defendant:
Lorenzo L. Austin, Jr., Christopher J. Graddock and Morgan & Morgan, P.A.
Plaintiff:
Arthur H. Bunte, Jr. and Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Austin et al v. AbbVie, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv08609
Plaintiff:
Ricky L. Austin and Belinda Austin
Defendant:
AbbVie, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Actavis, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott et al v. Adams et al
as 3:2012cv01121
Plaintiff:
Barbara A Scott , William L Austin and Monique L Jones
Defendant:
Sean Adams , Kevin Phegley , Elijah Moyers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Norfleet v. Illinois Department of Corrections
as 3:2010cv00626
Plaintiff:
Marc Norfleet
Defendant:
Roger E Walker, Sherry Benton, B Heck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2008cv00670
Plaintiff:
Eric D Walker
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Major Pickering and Daniel L Austin
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gilbert v. Pearl et al
as 3:2008cv00614
Plaintiff:
Robert Gilbert
Defendant:
Adrian Feinerman, Mary Loftin, Daniel L Austin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sykes v. Alfon et al
as 3:2008cv00076
Plaintiff:
Eddie J Sykes
Defendant:
David Alfon, Linda Runge, Daniel L Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washup v. Austin et al
as 1:2007cv06208
Respondent:
Daniel L Austin and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Petitioner:
J B Washup, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
