Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
RIVER ISLAND, INC. v. SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION A G et al
as 1:2023cv00242
Plaintiff:
RIVER ISLAND, INC.
Defendant:
SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION A G, SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION L L C, SYNGENTA CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
VANN v. SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION A G et al
as 1:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
GARY N. VANN
Defendant:
SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION A G, SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION L L C, SYNGENTA CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
TECHE FARM SUPPLIES v. SYNGENTA CORP et al
as 1:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
TECHE FARM SUPPLIES
Defendant:
SYNGENTA CORP., SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION L L C, SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION A G and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
H & R FARMS II v. SYNGENTA CORP. et al
as 1:2023cv00213
Plaintiff:
H & R FARMS II
Defendant:
SYNGENTA CORP., SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION L L C, SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION A G and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
THOMAS v. BRANNON et al
as 1:2020cv00017
Defendant:
OFFICER K. B. STEWART, MAGISTRATE H. D. BRANNON, RANDOLPH COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
Plaintiff:
QUANTEZ THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosing et al v. Boston et al
as 5:2015cv00080
Defendant:
Robert Boston , Robert LaBarge , Zloop L L C and others
Plaintiff:
Kendall Garrett Mosing and Zloop LA L L C
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Cook v. Corpening
as 1:2008cv00166
Petitioner:
Benny Arnold Cook
Respondent:
L. C. Corpening
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson v. Carswell et al
as 5:2008ct03030
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
K. A. Carswell, R. D. Young, L. C. Goodall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
