Cases 1 - 10 of 117
Thurman Gaines v. E. Horowitz, et al
as 22-15263
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THURMAN GAINES
Defendant / Appellee:
E. HOROWITZ, Dr.; MCSP
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, L. D. ZAMORA, Chief Exec., T. BYERS, SATF-Cor and others
(PC)Hash v. Rallos et al
as 2:2020cv01272
Plaintiff:
Lawrence George Hash
Defendant:
Curtis Allen, L. D. Zamora, A. Pfile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Theresa Torricellas v. Gia Bedford, et al
as 17-56415
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THERESA ANNETTE TORRICELLAS
Defendant - Appellee:
GIA BEDFORD, Medical Doctor, in her individual and official capacity, T. ELFU, Registered Nurse, in his/her individual and official capacity, G. VILLACORTA, Supervising Registered Nurse II, in his/her individual and official capacity and others
Hash v. Rallos et al
as 2:2017cv01721
Plaintiff:
Lawrence George Hash
Defendant:
T. Rallos, A. Pfile, Curtis Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hash v. Rallos et al
as 3:2017cv04648
Plaintiff:
Lawrence George Hash
Defendant:
T. Rallos, A. Pfile, Curtis Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pratt v. Kernan et al
as 5:2017cv04375
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Pratt
Defendant:
Scott Kernan, K. Kumar, Lawrence S. Gamboa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herbert Wolff v. State of California, et al
as 17-55508
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HERBERT D. WOLFF
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHINO STATE PRISON and others
Ibarra v. Zamora et al
as 1:2017cv00144
Plaintiff:
David Ibarra
Defendant:
L. D. Zamora, T. Brewer, L. Bluford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alonzo Joseph v. Heatley, et al
as 16-17009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALONZO JAMES JOSEPH
Defendant - Appellee:
HEATLEY, S. JOHNSON, L. D. ZAMORA and others
Hadden v. Kernan et al
as 3:2016cv02686
Plaintiff:
Michael Kenneth Hadden
Defendant:
Steve Kernan, W.L. Muniz, R.T.C. Grounds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
