Cases 1 - 9 of 9
United States of America v. Abbott et al
as 1:2023cv00853
Plaintiff:
United States of America.
Defendant:
Greg Abbott and The State of Texas
Amicus Curiae:
Jodey Arrington, Dr. Brian Babin, Cong. Andy Biggs and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 403 Obstruction of Navigable Waters
Chery v. Jackson et al
as 6:2019cv00005
Defendant:
Grievance Dept. Vicki Cundiff and Sergeant Johnny L. Jackson
Plaintiff:
Mickerson Chery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paez v. Akwitti et al
as 6:2017cv00360
Defendant:
Warden Chimdi A. Akwitti, Nurse Jennifer Collett and Sergeant Johnny L. Jackson
Plaintiff:
Reuben Paez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson, Sr. et al v. Travis County, Texas et al
as 1:2016cv00563
Defendant:
Deputy Kelly, Judge Denton, Darwin McKee and others
Plaintiff:
Charles L Jackson, Christopher W Jackson, Connie Sue Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Examination Management Services, Inc.
as 6:2013cv00180
Defendant:
Examination Management Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline L Jackson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Singleton v. Sammaniego et al
as 5:2011cv01121
Defendant:
Darrell D. Aguilar, Jorge R. Alvarez, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Montrey K. Singleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Thaler
as 5:2010cv00090
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Willie L. Jackson, Jr.
Respondent:
TDCJ Director Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Astrue
as 1:2009cv00612
Plaintiff:
Myrtle L. Jackson
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv00376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
