Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 43
QUINN v. LARIVA
as 2:2014cv00270
Respondent: L. LARIVA
Petitioner: ANTONIO D. QUINN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BANKS et al v. LARIVA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00259
Plaintiff: TELLY S. ARMSTRONG, GEOGRIA BANKS, LUCKY L. CHARLESTON and others
Defendant: L. LARIVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DELUCA v. LARIVA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00211
Petitioner: GEORGE A. DELUCA
Respondent: L. LARIVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ZAMBRELLA v. LARIVA
as 2:2014cv00193
Respondent: L. LARIVA
Petitioner: TAURUS ZAMBRELLA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BELL v. LARIVA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00174
Petitioner: KENNETH M. BELL
Respondent: L. LARIVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
COLEMAN v. LARIVA
as 2:2014cv00160
Petitioner: RONALD L. COLEMAN
Respondent: L. LARIVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CAMPBELL v. LARIVA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00154
Petitioner: CHRISTOPHER L. CAMPBELL
Respondent: L. LARIVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LANDERS v. COPE et al
as 2:2014mc00003
Defendant: MELISSA BAYLESS, BUREAU OF PRISONS EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS, F. TIMOTHY COLEMAN and others
Plaintiff: RUSSELL DEAN LANDERS
SHEPHERD v. LARIVA
as 2:2014cv00123
Respondent: L. LARIVA
Petitioner: JOSHUA EUGENE SHEPHERD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HEMBREE v. LARIVA
as 2:2014cv00119
Petitioner: SHANNON DEAN HEMBREE
Respondent: L. LARIVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?