Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Roberts v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00208
Petitioner:
Ronell L Roberts
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROBERTS v. LEMASTER
as 1:2023cv01308
Plaintiff:
REBECCA L. ROBERTS
Defendant:
EDWARD LEMASTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ATLANTIC SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. ROBERTS
as 4:2022cv00139
Plaintiff:
ATLANTIC SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
Jimmy L Roberts, Jr. and JIMMY L. ROBERTS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
ROBERTS v. INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 1:2022cv01060
Petitioner:
JEREMY C. ROBERTS and JEREMY L. ROBERTS
Respondent:
INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROBERTS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv00619
Plaintiff:
Megan Roberts, MEGAN L. ROBERTS and JAMES ROBERTS
Defendant:
INC. COOK GROUP, COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ARNOLD v. LOCKE et al
as 2:2021cv00409
Plaintiff:
KEANDRE ARNOLD
Defendant:
LOCKE, SERGEANT BREWER, WONDER and others
Not Classified By Court:
LIBERTY L. ROBERTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBERTS v. BERRYHILL
as 3:2019cv00035
Plaintiff:
SUSAN L. ROBERTS
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
ROBERTS et al v. CLARK COUNTY JAIL et al
as 4:2018cv00050
Defendant:
MAJOR SAM BEARD, CLARK COUNTY JAIL, DIRECTOR SCOTT CONLEN and others
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS M. JONES, SHAWN DRIE R. PRATT and TERRELL L. ROBERTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTS v. COLVIN
as 1:2016cv02125
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
REGINA L. ROBERTS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
