Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Thomas v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2021cv00042
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Carrie L Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. State of Mississippi
as 2:2017cv00151
Plaintiff:
James L. Thomas
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Dal Williamson, Jeannene T. Pacific and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prince et al v. Jarden Corporation et al
as 3:2014cv00601
Plaintiff:
Walter Prince , William L. Thomas , Charlie Ward and others
Defendant:
Jarden Corporation and Doe Defendants 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. King et al
as 4:2014cv00065
Petitioner:
Willie L. Thomas
Respondent:
Ron King and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cain v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2013cv00068
Plaintiff:
Dexter Austin Cain
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Johnnie E. Walls, Jr., Kenneth L. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conlee v. Rasco et al
as 3:2013cv00022
Plaintiff:
Roger Dale Conlee, Jr.
Defendant:
Bill Rasco, Chad Wicker, Freddie L. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Cain v. Walls et al
as 2:2012cv00072
Petitioner:
Dexter Austin Cain
Respondent:
Johnnie E. Walls, Jr. and Kenneth L. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Fannings v. State of Mississippi et al
as 2:2009cv00157
Plaintiff:
James A. Fannings, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Bolivar Co. Sheriff Department, Kenneth L. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
