Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Thomas v. USA
as 3:2019cv00372
Petitioner:
Johnathan L Thomas
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Anculle et al v. United States of America
as 3:2018cv00308
Plaintiff:
Anna M. Kraujalis, Priscilla A. Blackburn, Malibu K. Messer and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Thomas v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of et al (JRG2)
as 1:2016cv00124
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Plaintiff:
Betsy L. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Stout v. First Tennessee Bank et al
as 2:2015cv02194
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Stout
Defendant:
First Tennessee Bank and Elbert L. Thomas, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America et al v. Fox et al
as 1:2014cv00274
Defendant:
Daniel B. Fox, Clarissa D. Fox, Citizens Tri-County Bank and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Tennessee Valley Authority
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 258
State of Tennessee et al v. Haslam et al
as 3:2014cv00353
Plaintiff:
State of Tennessee and Herbert S. Moncier
Defendant:
Bill Haslam , Mark Goins , Robert E. Cooper, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv03101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Thomas v. Easterling et al
as 3:2009cv00667
Petitioner:
Carvin L. Thomas
Respondent:
Joe Easterling and Attorney General for the State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Easterling et al
as 3:2009mc00146
Petitioner:
Carvin L. Thomas
Respondent:
Joe Easterling and Attorney General for the State of Tennessee
United States, et al v. Thomas, et al
as 2:2003cv02416
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Andrew L. Thomas
Miscellaneou:
Anthony Mykael Bond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
