Cases 1 - 10 of 37
PEARSON v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2023cv03597
Plaintiff:
LAMAR R. PEARSON, SR.
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER, MENDOHLSON and DC RETIREMENT BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
ESTATE OF WANDA LORRAINE KELLY JOHNSON et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2023cv01689
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF WANDA LORRAINE KELLY JOHNSON, ARI SIMONE FOSTER, ESTATE OF ETHELEAN KING KELLY and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
ADESHINA v. BUSH et al
as 1:2022cv00906
Plaintiff:
YINKA ADESHINA
Defendant:
GEORGE W. BUSH, BILL J. CLINTON, ELON MUSK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FORBES v. HARKER et al
as 1:2021cv02175
Petitioner:
LAMAR A. FORBES
Respondent:
THOMAS HARKER and RANDALL LAMOUREUX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LAMAR v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2021cv01497
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LAMAR
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00640
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
MOORE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2020cv03423
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Plaintiff:
LAMAR MOORE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
ADAMS v. DOLE et al
as 1:2020cv00477
Defendant:
MITCH A. MCCONNELL, JR., BOB J. DOLE and LAMAR A. ALEXANDER
Plaintiff:
DALE B. ADAMS and DALE BRENT ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01918
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602
PLATTE RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY v. PRECISION CONTRACTING SOLUTIONS, LP et al
as 1:2019cv01556
Plaintiff:
Platte River Insurance Company
Defendant:
Lamar Toland, Derrick S Sieber, Precision Contracting Solutions LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
