Cases 1 - 10 of 129
MORRIS MOSS v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
DEMANZIO LAMONT MORRIS MOSS
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Beverley et al v. Jayco, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lamont Beverley and Victoria F. Beverley
Defendant:
Jayco Inc and Camping World RV Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Ingram v. English et al
as 3:2023cv01001
Plaintiff:
Darrius L Ingram, Darrius Lamont Ingram, Darius L Ingram and others
Defendant:
Ryan English and Wells
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VALES v. OLDHAM COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2023cv02045
Plaintiff:
LAMONT VALES
Defendant:
OLDHAM COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Jaime et al
as 3:2023cv00680
Defendant:
Wellpath Medical Staffing, Jaime and Wellpath Medical
Plaintiff:
Jason Lamont Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Christensen et al
as 3:2023cv00585
Plaintiff:
Channing Lamonte Scott
Defendant:
Derek Christensen, Galipeau and Gann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Christensen et al
as 2:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Channing Lamonte Scott
Defendant:
Derek Christensen, Galipeau and Gann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Galipeau et al
as 2:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
Channing Lamonte Scott
Defendant:
Galipeau, Gann and Indiana Dept. of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2023cv00582
Plaintiff:
Channing Lamonte Scott
Defendant:
Galipeau, Gann and Indiana Dept. of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
