Cases
Barbara Sopkin v. Jill Mendelson
as 22-1992
Plaintiff / Appellant: BARBARA SOPKIN, Citizen of Israel in Her Capacity as Assignee of Lucre Investments Ltd, General Partner of Interlase Limited Partnership, a Georgia Limited Partnership, and in a Derivative Action for Interlase Limited Partnership
Defendant / Appellee: JILL C. MENDELSON, Executor of Estate of Richard S. Mendelson, Deceased, RICHARD S. MENDELSON TRUST, H. Carter Land III, Trustee, LAND, CARROLL & BLAIR, P.C., f/k/a Land Clark Carroll Mendelson Blair P.C. and others
Defendant: JOHN WILLIAM TOOTHMAN, Attorney, MADELINE A. TRAINOR, Attorney, JOHN DOES 1-5, Trustees of Richard S. Mendelson Trust and others
Barbara Sopkin v. Jill Mendelson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1763
Defendant / Appellee: RICHARD S. MENDELSON TRUST, LAND CLARK CARROLL MENDELSON BLAIR P.C. and JILL C. MENDELSON, Executor of Estate of Richard S. Mendelson
Plaintiff / Appellant: BARBARA SOPKIN, General Partner for Interlase Limited Partnership
Barbara Sopkin v. Jill Mendelson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1626
Plaintiff - Appellant: BARBARA SOPKIN, Citizen of Israel in Her Capacity as Assignee of Lucre Investments Ltd, General Partner of Interlase Limited Partnership, a Georgia Limited Partnership, and in a Derivative Action for Interlase Limited Partnership
Defendant - Appellee: JILL C. MENDELSON, Executor of Estate of Richard S. Mendelson, Deceased, RICHARD S. MENDELSON TRUST, H. Carter Land III, Trustee, LAND CLARK CARROLL BLAIR, P.C., f/k/a Land Clark Carroll Mendelson Blair P.C. and others
Defendant: JOHN DOES 1-5, Trustees of Richard S. Mendelson Trust
Sopkin v. Mendelson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01146
Plaintiff: Barbara Sopkin
Defendant: Jill C. Mendelson, Richard S. Mendelson Trust, John Does Nos. 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?