Cases 11 - 20 of 76
Does v. Lawrence Wasden, et al
as 19-35391
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE RODRIGUEZ, Nez Perce County Sheriff, MATTHEW THOMAS, Sheriff, Sexual Offender Management Board, CRAIG T. ROWLAND, Bingham County Sheriff and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOES, John and Jane, 1-134
Hunter v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2019cv00113
Plaintiff:
Wylie G Hunter
Defendant:
Does 1-5, Amy Jordan, Lisa Correia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Almerico et al v. Denney et al
as 1:2018cv00239
Plaintiff:
Anna Almerico , Chelsea Gaona-Lincoln , Micaela Akasha De Loyola-Carkin and others
Defendant:
Lawrence Denney , Lawrence Wasden and Russell Barron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2017cv00348
Plaintiff:
Faron Raymond Hawkins
Defendant:
State of Idaho, United States of America, C. L. Otter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Atencio et al
as 1:2017cv00106
Petitioner:
Mark Lee Ellis
Respondent:
Henry Atencio and Lawrence Wasden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hawkins v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2017cv00084
Plaintiff:
Faron Raymond Hawkins
Defendant:
State of Idaho, C. L. Otter, Lawrence Wasden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2017cv00075
Plaintiff:
Faron Raymond Hawkins
Defendant:
State of Idaho, C. L. Otter, Michael McLaughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2017cv00076
Plaintiff:
Faron Raymond Hawkins
Defendant:
State of Idaho, C. L. Otter, Michael McLaughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Rich et al
as 1:2017cv00064
Plaintiff:
Faron Raymond Hawkins
Defendant:
Christopher Rich, Jan Bennetts, Roger Bourne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paddock v. Otter et al
as 1:2017cv00032
Plaintiff:
Kim Paddock
Defendant:
C.L. (Butch) Otter, Lawrence Wasden and Idaho Department of Health and Welfare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
