Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Wade v. United States of America et al
as 4:2023cv00385
Plaintiff:
Ronald G Wade, Jr
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Oklahoma, City of Tulsa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Melton v. Lawson
as 3:2023cv00020
Defendant:
Stephanee Rachel Lawson and Stephanee Schalagel Lawson
Plaintiff:
Katherin E Melton and Katherine E Melton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Wade v. United States of America et al
as 4:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gene Wade, Jr
Defendant:
United Sates of America, State of Oklahoma, City of Tulsa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Berisha v. Lawson et al
as 1:2017cv22144
Plaintiff:
Shkelzen Berisha
Defendant:
Guy Lawson , Efraim Diveroli, Alexander Podrizki and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THE HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL v. LAWSON
as 2:2013cv05272
Plaintiff:
THE HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
RANDY Y. LAWSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lawson v. Chabrowski
as 3:2013cv01130
Plaintiff:
Courtney Lawson
Defendant:
Darius Derek Chabrowski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Chabrowski v. Lawson et al
as 5:2012cv06339
Plaintiff:
Derek Chabrowski
Defendant:
Courtney Lawson , James Lawson and Jacqueline Lawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Nauvoo Investment INC v. Lawson et al
as 1:2012cv01132
Plaintiff:
Nauvoo Investment INC
Defendant:
Steve Lawson and Sherry Lawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lawson v. Saks Fifth Avenue, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv01190
Defendant:
Associate John Doe, Shanette Monteith, Saks Fifth Avenue, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Diana Lawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Melanie Kelley v. Edward Saleeby, Jr.
as 08-2045
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELANIE KELLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD E. SALEEBY, JR., DEBBIE J. FREEMAN, HARRIET E. WILMETH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
