Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Barton et al.
as 3:2022mc00013
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Timothy Barton, Carnegie Development, LLC, Wall007, LLC and others
Receiver:
Cortney C. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Barton et al
as 2:2022mc51616
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Timothy Barton, Carnegie Development, LLC, WALL007, LLC and others
Receiver:
Cortney C. Thomas
Securities and Exchange Commission et al v. Barton et al
as 2:2022mc03990
Defendant:
Haoqiang Fu, Timothy Barton, Carnegie Development LLC and others
Receiver:
C. Cortney Thomas and Cortney C. Thomas
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Barton et al
as 1:2022mc23463
Plaintiff:
Securities & Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Timothy Barton, CARNEGIE DEVELOPMENT, LLC, WALL007, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Barton et al
as 2:2022ms00054
Defendant:
Haoqiang Fu, Timothy Barton, Carnegie Development LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Barton et al
as 3:2022cv02118
Defendant:
Haoqiang Fu, Timothy Barton, Carnegie Development LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Respondent:
Bank of America, N.A. and Bank of America NA
Interested Party:
HNGH Turtle Creek, Maximilien Barton, Gillespie Villas LLC and others
Receiver:
Receiver
Intervenor:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Southern Properties Capital Ltd, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, First Development Company of Ohio LLC and others
Not Classified By Court:
Texas Republic Bank, N.A. and ADR Provider
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
