Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Lee Evans et al v. Cardlytics,Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv00606
Plaintiff:
Lee Evans
Counter Defendant:
Nicola Evans
Defendant:
Cardlytics,Inc. and Does 1-20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Lee Evans et al v. Cardlytics,Inc. et al
as 2:2023mc00044
Plaintiff:
LEE EVANS and NICOLA EVANS
Defendant:
CARDLYTICS, INC., Cardlytics,Inc. and Does 1-20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Eddie Lee Evans v. Kelly Santoro
as 2:2021cv04812
Defendant:
Warden Kelly Santoro, as Warden
Petitioner:
Eddie Lee Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Citizens for Quality Education San Diego et al v. San Diego Unified School District et al
as 3:2017cv01054
Plaintiff:
Citizens for Quality Education San Diego , San Diego Asian Americans for Equality Foundation , Scott Hasson and others
Defendant:
San Diego Unified School District, Richard Barrera, Kevin Beiser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv02847
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Evans
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc. and Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Evans et al v. Midwest Center for Stress and Anxiety, LLC
as 2:2015cv01142
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lee Evans and Don Adam Gordon
Defendant:
Midwest Center for Stress and Anxiety, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James Lee Evans Jr v. W. L. Montgomery
as 2:2015cv03296
Petitioner:
James Lee Evans, Jr
Respondent:
W. L. Montgomery
Ronnie Lee Evans v. M D McDonald
as 5:2011cv00072
Petitioner:
Ronnie Lee Evans
Respondent:
M D McDonald
James Lee Evans v. Felker et al
as 5:2007cv00371
Petitioner:
James Lee Evans
Respondent:
Tom Felker and Bill Lockyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
