Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Chestnut et al v. Klund et al
as 0:2022cv02714
Plaintiff:
Marvin Lewis Chestnut, Lawrence Anthony Barnes, Charles Nguyen Thorstad and others
Defendant:
Darcy Klund, Michael Kennedy, Joseph Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Chestnut et al
as 0:2022cv02712
Plaintiff:
Marvin Lewis Chestnut, Lawrence Anthony Barnes and Charles Nguyen Thorstad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Clervrain et al v. Coffman et al
as 0:2022cv00873
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Delzs Rigarte Cineus
Defendant:
Cynthia Coffman, Jared Polis, Philip J. Weiser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis et al v. Walz
as 0:2020cv01212
Defendant:
Timothy J. Walz
Plaintiff:
Jason Lewis for Senate and Jason Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv00058
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis v. Minnesota, State of, The
as 0:2019cv03077
Defendant:
Minnesota, State of, The
Plaintiff:
Cecilia Lynn Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Birapaka v. U.S. Army Research Laboratory et al
as 0:2017cv04090
Plaintiff:
Vara Birapaka
Defendant:
U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Regents of the University of California, The, Regents of the University of California and Griffith University, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley v. City of Minneapolis et al
as 0:2017cv02396
Plaintiff:
Latoya D. Bradley
Defendant:
City of Minneapolis, Robert Lewis and David Mattson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Metro Transit Police et al
as 0:2016cv02817
Plaintiff:
Qui Lewis
Defendant:
City of Anoka, MPD Officers, David Hutchinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
