Cases 31 - 40 of 92
DEEUGENIO et al v. BOROUGH OF GLASSBORO et al
as 1:2019cv20521
Defendant:
HECTOR CABEZAS, ANNA MILLER, JOHN AND JANE DOE 1-20 (FICTITIOUS NAMES) and others
Plaintiff:
DR. LEWIS DEEUGENIO, JR. and SUMMIT CITY FARMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv20013
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv19343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SAUNDERS v. ARTS COUNCIL OF PRINCETON et al
as 3:2019cv19018
Defendant:
MUNICIPALITY PRINCETON, ARTS COUNCIL OF PRINCETON, MUESUM OF ART FOR PRINCETON UNIVERSITY and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HARDY SAUNDERS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
GERNDT v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, et al
as 2:2019cv13008
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW GERNDT
Defendant:
ABC AND XYZ CORPORATIONS 1-10, JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10, TRP. OMARI LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS et al v. LATINI et al
as 3:2019cv06493
Plaintiff:
LHI HOLDINGS, LLC, CRAIG LEWIS and ANTONIA LEWIS
Defendant:
PLANNING BD OF TWP OF EWING, ANN FARNHAM, MEMBERS OF SITE REVIEW COMMITTEE OF PLANNING BD OF TWP OF EWING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
VREELAND v. SUPERIOR PLUS ENERGY SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00092
Defendant:
ROBERT LEWIS, FRANCIS GUIDO, DEBORAH RANSON and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN VREELAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv16201
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv15699
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv15023
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
