Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Ellis v.County of Hamilton, Tennessee et al
as 1:2023cv00099
Defendant:
Hamilton County Government, Bryan Sinclair Ellis, County of Hamilton, Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Miller v. County of Hamilton, Tennessee et al
as 1:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Matthew Drew Miller
Defendant:
County of Hamilton, Tennessee, Sheriff Jim Hammond, QCHC of Tennessee, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Hale v. Johnson
as 1:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lewis Hale, Jr.
Defendant:
Roger Chadswick Johnson, Charlie Riffenberry, Sherry Sheldon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kuntz et al v. Garrison et al
as 2:2021cv00117
Plaintiff:
Rachel L Kuntz, R.D.B. and Britton Ashton Bowers
Defendant:
Amanda Burke Garrison, Chad Lewis and Andrea Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Tullahoma Police Department et al (PLR1)
as 4:2020cv00035
Plaintiff:
Mrs Lydranna T Lewis
Defendant:
Jacob Smith, Tullahoma Police Department, City of Tullahoma, Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00237
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Buhl v. Wilburn et al
as 1:2020cv00025
Defendant:
Bill Lewis, Chris Wilburn, City of Madisonville and others
Plaintiff:
William R Buhl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cagle v. Hamilton County Government et al
as 1:2020cv00021
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Cagle
Defendant:
Michael Craig, Joseph Jones, Wesley Birjkovff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
