Cases 11 - 20 of 132
Butler et al v. Conger et al
as 1:2023cv01054
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D. Butler, Clementene Butler, Aineisha Butler and others
Defendant:
Scott Conger, Lewis L Cobb and City of Jackson Madison County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hall v. City of La Vergne, Tennessee et al
as 3:2023cv00173
Plaintiff:
Maegan Olivia Hall
Defendant:
City of La Vergne, Tennessee, Burrel "Chip" Davis and Henry "Ty" McGowan
Counter Plaintiff:
Lewis Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Hale v. Johnson
as 1:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lewis Hale, Jr.
Defendant:
Roger Chadswick Johnson, Charlie Riffenberry, Sherry Sheldon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02032
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Murray v. Chan's Frame and Body Shop, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00033
Plaintiff:
Dylan Murray
Defendant:
Chan's Frame and Body Shop, LLC, John Mark Roberts, Casey Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kuntz et al v. Garrison et al
as 2:2021cv00117
Plaintiff:
Rachel L Kuntz, R.D.B. and Britton Ashton Bowers
Defendant:
Amanda Burke Garrison, Chad Lewis and Andrea Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
